Posts Tagged ‘sex crimes’

“SlutWalk” in Grand Rapids Encourages Michigan Residents to Stop Blaming Victims of Sexual Assault

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

Last Saturday, anyone in downtown Grand Rapids likely heard chanters crying: “However we dress, wherever we go, yes means yes, and no means no!” The crowd had gathered for “SlutWalk Grand Rapids,” an event organized by the National Organization for Women of Greater Grand Rapids encouraging others to stop blaming victims of sexual assault based on how they dress.

Top criminal attorneys know that many people have misconceptions about who is to blame in sex crime cases–particularly if a female victim is dressed in skimpy clothing. “Men can walk around in their shorts with no shirt on and no one thinks a thing about it,” explained Ionia resident Corinn Fuller, 22. “Women, if they wear a sports bra to go jogging they’re victimized. I’ve been in groups of people and they see people walking by and say ‘oh, they’re dressed like a slut, they must be asking for it…”

However, statistics show that dressing a certain way does not necessarily safeguard against rape and sexual assault. In the United States alone, one in every six women have been raped or the victim of attempted rape–in fact, sexual assault is so common that someone is victimized every 45 seconds. It is highly unlikely that in every rape or sexual assault the way the person was dressed was a fundamental factor. Rockford resident Clara Rouse, 22, has similar sentiments. “It’s not you personally that causes whatever happens,” she relayed. “If someone’s going to rape you, they’re going to rape you regardless if you’re dressed like this or if you’re in a baggy T-shirt and shorts.”

Regardless of whether one is a top criminal lawyer or not, this is an important issue that applies to everyone. All women have a right to decide how they want to dress without a fear of rape or sexual assault. It is very commendable that so many Michigan residents gathered to support a great cause and raise sex crime awareness.  When we work together to eliminate the public stigma and bias, we allow the legal system to function as it is intended – - in the best interest of all citizens.

Top Criminal Attorneys – Michigan Ex-Cons Find Difficulty in Landing a Job

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

One does not need to be a top criminal lawyer in Michigan to know that the state’s economy has been on a downward spiral for the last few years. Finding a job for educated, law-abiding citizens is incredibly difficult, and many Michigan residents have found themselves going into debt or foreclosure while trying to find work. However, there is a group of people who have an even harder time landing a job in Michigan: ex-convicts.

An example of such a person is 43 year-old Michael Marsh, who was released from prison in 2009 after serving ten years for second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a child under the age of 13. It did not take Marsh long to discover that the consequences of criminal convictions last much longer than one’s jail or prison sentence. Over the course of 18 months, Marsh filled out over 200 job applications but was only called for four interviews, each of which ended in disappointment after employers learned that he was an ex-felon. Disheartened, Marsh explained “I went to prison, did my time, and according to laws and churches, everyone should be forgiven and have a second chance. Under this crime, I don’t get a second chance.”

According to research conducted at Michigan State University, Marsh’s difficulty landing a job is not uncommon. The study reported that 30 percent of employers absolutely refuse to hire ex-felons, and that persons convicted of sexual crimes have the most difficult road to finding employment. Besides being restricted from employment in certain places (i.e. schools), paroled sex crime convicts are largely turned away due to the social stigma associated with their crimes. When deciding whether or not to give a released felon a job, employers look at many things, such as the duration since the offense and the liabilities the business may face as a result. The study pointed out that employers are far more likely to hire ex-convicts who have showed signs of rehabilitation.

Having outside assistance after release from incarceration is crucial to reintegrating ex-cons into society. Even though most employers would turn away an ex-convict applying for a job, some employers (namely non-profits) offer short-term employment, usually through the Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative. This program provides tools that help paroled convicts reintegrate themselves into society, such as assistance with resumes and cover letters, access to a statewide job bank, and opportunities to build their skills.

Although there are many obstacles on an ex-convict’s road to landing a job, about 44 percent of people who take advantage of assistance programs (such as the Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative) find some way to make a steady income. As this number continues to grow, employers are encouraged to hire ex-felons through the Work Opportunity Tax Credit, which offers business owners 40 percent of a hired ex-convict’s salary if he or she is employed for at least one year. And if the tax incentives are not good enough for employers to consider hiring an ex-con, many business owners who have taken a chance on these individuals found themselves “impressed by their work ethic,” turning them over at a far lower rate than other employees.

Michigan judges do not factor in future employment problems when deciding on an appropriate sentence for a convicted person. As top criminal attorneys in Michigan, it is difficult for Kronzek & Cronkright to turn a blind eye to this problem. Our justice system simply cannot be effective if we do not provide for the full rehabilitation of paroled offenders. In fact, those who do not receive assistance after release are the most likely to return to jail or prison, costing taxpayers even more money to keep them locked up. Instead, it is a much better idea to work with paroled convicts so that they may not only reintegrate themselves into society, but also move on with their lives as law-abiding citizens.

MI Sex Crimes – Defendants: Has Your Sex Crime Lawyer Given You All The Facts (and Consequences) of Your Guilty Plea?

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

Every sex crime lawyer knows all too well: regardless of where it occurs, guilty pleas or convictions for sex crimes will have a significant impact on the defendant’s life. In Michigan, the Sex Offender Registration Act requires these individuals to submit personal information to a large public database called the Michigan Public Sex Offender Registry. In short, this is an extensive list of Michigan residents who have pled guilty to—or have been convicted of—certain crimes that are sexual in nature.

As one could imagine, being on this list is not only embarrassing, but can be a serious hindrance to getting a job, doing certain volunteer work, attending events at schools, and much more. Available for public viewing online, the Sex Offender Registry shows a photo of the accused sex offender, along with his or her name, date of birth, and their convicted crime.

In a case recently decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals, Derek Fonville pled guilty to the crime of Child Enticement, a sex crime that requires registration on the Sex Offender registry. When he discovered this information, Fonville was surprised and upset, as his sex crime attorney never told him that a guilty plea for Child Enticement meant inclusion on the Michigan Sex Offender Registry.  Fonville argued that if he had known that, he would never have pled guilty in the first place and would have preferred a criminal trial—particularly as his specific case, all parties agree that there was nothing sexual about the acts he committed. Nonetheless, Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), lists that crime as one that requires registration regardless of whether there is anything sexual connected with the actual offense.

The Michigan Court of Appeals held that Fonville’s criminal defense attorney needed to have told Fonville that by pleading guilty to this particular crime, Fonville would be required to register as a sex offender. Because the attorney never told Fonville this information, he won his claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel against the attorney and the case was sent back to the trial court, ultimately reversing Fonville’s conviction.

So, what does this ruling mean for individuals required to register as a sex offender? If you have been charged with a Michigan sex crime for which a guilty plea requires registration on the Sex Offender Registry, your attorney must warn you of this consequence before you plead guilty. If your sex crime lawyers did not do this, you can appeal your plea, arguing that this information would have influenced your plea. For this reason specifically, it is important to have a skilled and knowledgeable defense attorneys on your side—not only will it guarantee the best legal advice and representation, but a fight to protect your personal liberties and reputation.